what was that? is that all there is? who is this? this is it.

pilderwasser unlimited T-shirts  pilder what? kickstand P know knew spew snap shots autoBIKEography RAGBRAI  slide shows phot-o-rama stationary-a-gogo 1/2 x 3/32 links

weak daily

December 26, 2007

 

The headline on the front page of this morning’s PI was “Should Bicyclists Be Licensed to Ride?” Not just front page but the top story. You can click on the article and read it, but it won’t give you the same feeling as seeing it in a newspaper box on a street corner, on a table in a law firm, in a coffee shop, or discarded in a large office building later in the day, which is where I finally got my hands on the paper because I refuse to pay for the PI. It was about 7 hours after Jason told me about the headline. He said, “read it, summarize it, and blog it up.” Well here it is.

The local media is weak. So weak it’s about watching the local news only for the weather and sports. It’s about reading the local paper only for the weather and sports. Yes. Yes that’s what people do. The PI is the weakest of the weak, it makes the Weekly look strong. Perhaps you pick up the paper for the crossword puzzle or the horoscope. Or maybe you’re looking for what’s on channel 9 at 11:00pm.

So, this big story, this front page headline article…it’s weak. It’s as if they had nothing else to talk about and they picked this lame lead story on the day after Christmas. It’s an old story, one that runs in cycles, one we‘ve heard before. Whenever a local politician jaywalks and gets brushed by a law abiding cyclist, the city council threatens to crack down on cyclists. Whenever a well-connected member of society has an issue with bikes on city streets somebody in the local media or government speaks up about it.

The article answers its own questions and is not worthy of being the lead, front page story. We cannot assume that a guy on a bike does not pay any property taxes, gas taxes and does not own any motor vehicles and pay taxes on those too. You see me on a bike…I’m a cyclist. When I get off and lock it up, then what am I? Am I a tax paying civilian? Maybe. Or maybe I’m a just another Seattle resident. What if I drive to the Park ‘n Ride then ride a bike into Seattle, then what am I?

You, yeah you, stuck in traffic on Mercer Street…your goal is to get more people out of their cars and onto public transportation or alternate forms of transport like bikes or walking or perhaps onto one of Bezos’  Segways so your commute will be shorter. You, sitting in your car on Mercer, are the same buttsore jackass that wants to tax cyclists for using the roads? You’re a bit misdirected and I bet your attention span is so short you saw that headline and formed an opinion and never even picked up the paper. Well that’s OK, I understand. And I’ll be the guy on the bike, white-lining by you on Mercer Street with my U-lock tugging my pants down just enough to expose the top of my ass crack. You won’t see my face but I’ll be smiling.

The authors’ email address is at the end of the PI article, you can share your opinions with her or with the editor of the PI.

Or can share your opinions right here.
Add Comment

Maiden Boise said...

Is it a red shoe thing, then?

Posted December 27, 2007 10:59 AM | Reply to this comment

pilder replied to Maiden Boise...

perhaps it is All About the Shoes. That's Peter Seattle Legal shredding the Dexter commuters...as seen in the local paper a while back. I bet all those dudes pay taxes, property-gas-et al.

Posted December 27, 2007 08:32 PM | Reply to this comment

3dbuddha said...

That's bullshit as in same bullshit, different day I have a gripe. It's not a gripe, but I'm gonna make it a gripe. It's not my problem, it's now your problem, cause I'm important. I deserve better, and your paying for it. Or maybe the editor was on vacation with his girlfriend so no one wanted to work. Out comes trash articles spawned by letters to the editor from people with nothing but time and money on their hands to bitch about what every one else is doing for enjoying their lives, while they sit commiserating to themselves, and the editor, about their own unhappiness projected on others. Or maybe we really should give up the ideal and become a capitalistic totalitarian society. Or maybe forget it, drink a beer, and watch it pass like so many other gripe fads. Or maybe the editor should look at reuters once in a while. No helmet, no tech gear, red shoes, better style, faster rider. It's not the bike, it's man in the saddle. K

Posted December 27, 2007 10:15 PM | Reply to this comment

Bronco said...

I'm glad I'm on vacation. I forgot how bad I fucking hate people:i.e. jackass p.i. douchbags who sit and write about shit their spineless asses will never understand. It's a quality of life issue. Have a nice white-lining day.

Posted December 28, 2007 12:36 AM | Reply to this comment

cat said...

(word, kels!) is it wrong to not even bother to read the article and still comment? I don't care, I'll do it anyway. heard a piece on the radio today claiming that the entire interstate system exists today because pedal cyclists demanded better roads to transport themselves on before all the motors came along. it's one argument of many. whatever, i hate the PI.

Posted December 29, 2007 12:15 AM | Reply to this comment

pilder replied to cat...

you don't need to read the article Cat. I hate the PI too. I don't even like 101 Elliott West. I kinda like Elliott Smith. And it's true I believe that roads were paved first for bikes, for cyclists sick of getting bogged down in the mud and horseshit. Cycles. Go round, come around

Posted December 29, 2007 08:31 AM | Reply to this comment

Stevil Kinevil said...

Everybody knows anyone who has to ride a bike to get a round is ether too poor to afford a car or too crazy to obtain a drivers license. How does the higher power figure any of the downtrodden is going to be able to afford the license for a bicycle? Im off to drive my Hummer with another Hummer on the hitch. (Both running, of course.) Good luck with all of this.

Posted December 29, 2007 02:33 PM | Reply to this comment

Case said...

wow

Posted December 31, 2007 06:46 PM | Reply to this comment

Add Comment

Your Name: (Required)
Comment:

Please enter the 4 to 6 character security code:

(This is to prevent automated comments.)