what was that? is that all there is? who is this? this is it.

juiced up beyond belief. or not. either way. that's entertainment. power to weight ratios off the charts. pushing the technology the biology the physiology to new limits. that's entertainment. 

4 Comments

I just don't see how any of the guys in contention can't be on the gear. Full natty brah? I just can't see it. Otoh, Froome seems genuine, and a nice enough bloke, so who really knows. Either way, I still watch, and that's what it's all about for pro cycling. Bums on seats, eyeballs on screen. It's all about selling more shit to the masses, and the Tour is an excellent vehicle for that.

word. $$$ $$$$$$ $$$ $$$$$$$$$ $$$$$

Quintana and Froome side by side the ultimate odd couple contrast in styles and body types going up and down the mountain. that's entertainment.

I meant to write above "I just don't see how any of the guys in contention can't NOT be on the gear" ie. in order to be in contention, they must be on something. I guess the confusion arises when you get into the nit picky details of what's considered doping and what isn't. Whatever, I'm still watching. Sorry for any confusion.

Add Comment

Your Name: (Required)

Comment:

Please enter the 4 to 6 character security code:

(This is to prevent automated comments.)